{ "schema_version": "1.1.0", "release": "0.3.7", "as_of": "2026-10-13", "status": "public research resource", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "coverage_note": "Eight selected cases across ten scientific domains. Seventeen source works include sixteen with scoped evidence notes and one unread access lead. Coverage is selective; a missing review is not evidence that a field is empty.", "context_note": "FogLab remains a proposed in-house measurement platform. PondFall retains four distinct architectures: collect-and-drain, directed deposition, growth-and-settling, and biological interception/catchment. They are context, not proven transfers.", "domains": [ { "id": "D01", "name": "Atomic and electronic structure" }, { "id": "D02", "name": "Molecular water and confinement" }, { "id": "D03", "name": "Surfaces and geometry" }, { "id": "D04", "name": "Electrical droplets and aerosols" }, { "id": "D05", "name": "Phase transitions and sorption" }, { "id": "D06", "name": "Optical, radiative and thermal processes" }, { "id": "D07", "name": "Acoustic and mechanical control" }, { "id": "D08", "name": "Biology and living systems" }, { "id": "D09", "name": "Flow, clouds and atmospheric systems" }, { "id": "D10", "name": "Measurement and computational discovery" } ], "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "Interfacial heavy fermion formation in a two-dimensional Kondo lattice YbCu2 on Cu(111) substrate", "authors": "Nakamura et al.", "doi": "10.1038/s43246-026-01332-5", "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43246-026-01332-5", "version": "Published article, 6 October 2026; retrieved 13 October 2026", "work_key": "10.1038/s43246-026-01332-5", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-001/", "reading_depth": "selected main text and supplement", "review_scope": "Selected Results and Figs. 2–4 text/captions; Methods: sample preparation and experiments. Supplementary Note 5 and rendered Fig. S5 inspected.", "access_limitation": "Raw datasets and a complete supplementary review are outstanding.", "next_access": "Read remaining supplement and available author/repository datasets.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "495516a0c8bc9687e80cd036fd65b133166c598d3617d2a6322894be73a39cc7", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "Unlocking the fog: assessing fog collection potential and need as a complementary water resource in arid urban lands–the Alto Hospicio, Chile case", "authors": "Carter et al.", "doi": "10.3389/fenvs.2025.1537058", "url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1537058/full", "version": "Published HTML, 20 February 2025", "work_key": "10.3389/fenvs.2025.1537058", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-002/", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "review_scope": "Methods 3.1–3.2, Table 1; Results 4.2.1–4.2.2 and figure descriptions; 5.1 and Conclusion. Selected original HTML passages read.", "access_limitation": "Raw monitoring series, complete calibration record and AMARU companion methods not audited.", "next_access": "Obtain underlying site series and inspect the AMARU methods paper before forecasting.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "22207ebb786f1ecbe6fb96ee51577da890bd91fe02a0b83c08f057c1100428ad", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "Molecular mechanism of ice nucleation on feldspar", "authors": "Zhou and Piaggi", "doi": "10.48550/arXiv.2511.13402", "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.13402v4", "version": "arXiv:2511.13402v4, 25 June 2026; first posted 17 November 2025", "work_key": "10.48550/arxiv.2511.13402", "related_versions": [ "https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13402v1", "https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13402v2", "https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13402v3" ], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-003/", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "review_scope": "v4 abstract, surface screening and seeding results, Fig. 3 text/caption, Conclusions and selected Methods; earlier versions not compared.", "access_limitation": "Supplementary calculations and earlier version text not reviewed or compared.", "next_access": "Read the versioned supplement and compare earlier versions before resolving changes.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "96a5cc280c69000417b3ab189734a2b0c85a54d40bab463b77f0647108ad85e8", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "Ice nucleation on microcline (001) in the absence of active sites", "authors": "Schneider et al.", "doi": "10.1038/s41467-026-76548-7", "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-76548-7", "version": "Published article, 25 August 2026", "work_key": "10.1038/s41467-026-76548-7", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-004/", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "review_scope": "Selected Results and Figs. 2–5 text/captions; AFM sample preparation and simulation Methods.", "access_limitation": "Supplementary results and source data have not been independently audited.", "next_access": "Review cycle-level supplement and source data for independent surface preparations.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "88883ac81d97d556fcbe9ec24af3694b92c2f9d89845ad367f3ba3832c4defb3", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "Measurement report: Ice nucleation ability of perthite feldspar powder", "authors": "Canet et al.", "doi": "10.5194/acp-26-5635-2026", "url": "https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5635/2026/acp-26-5635-2026.html", "version": "Published article, 24 April 2026", "work_key": "10.5194/acp-26-5635-2026", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-005/", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "review_scope": "Abstract and Experimental sections 2.1–2.4; material characterization.", "access_limitation": "Supplement and complete freezing spectra not reanalysed.", "next_access": "Read supplement, raw spectra and batch-level preparation record.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "c066835641e2657740d58da7e82a5383d11d28e41ad5b3b083a67beca6b56f4a", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "Mitigating Fog Attenuation with Acoustic Waves in Free-Space Optical Systems", "authors": "Cameron et al.", "doi": "10.1109/JLT.2026.3704738", "url": "https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/389759/2/389759.pdf", "version": "Glasgow repository manuscript 389759/2; PDF metadata 10 August 2026", "work_key": "10.1109/jlt.2026.3704738", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-006/", "reading_depth": "selected manuscript text and figures", "review_scope": "Abstract; experimental setup and results on manuscript pp. 4–5; Figs. 2–5 inspected in rendered pages. PDF metadata checked.", "access_limitation": "Journal-version text not compared. Abstract/result time origins and attenuation endpoints remain unreconciled.", "next_access": "Compare the version of record, figure source data and definitions through lawful repository/library access.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "1c268ed30e9d8fa79da209db1e0fb6b9bc6be88a5689bcae41e096cd8f4dca47", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "Investigation of critical response characteristics of micro-droplets under the action of low-frequency acoustic waves", "authors": "Bai, Shi, Zhao and Wei", "doi": "10.3389/fenvs.2022.972648", "url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.972648/full", "version": "Published HTML, 30 September 2022", "work_key": "10.3389/fenvs.2022.972648", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-007/", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "review_scope": "Abstract and Methods sections 2.1–2.3.", "access_limitation": "Run allocation, independent preparations, serial dependence and the relation between abstract sets and methods groups are unresolved.", "next_access": "Review complete run-level data and statistical units before planning power.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "17fd462e11ca9465b7ae4107c479b7fd63e298e1af4a14f2db929a2624acc177", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-008", "title": "In Situ Experimental Study of Cloud-Precipitation Interference by Low-Frequency Acoustic Waves", "authors": "Shi, Qiao, Wang and Wei", "doi": "10.3390/rs15040993", "url": "https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/4/993", "version": "Published article, February 2023", "work_key": "10.3390/rs15040993", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-008/", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "review_scope": "Abstract, section 3.1 test procedure and section 5 Conclusions, including the final attribution limitation.", "access_limitation": "Full allocation history and independence from related field reports not resolved; supplement not reviewed.", "next_access": "Inspect allocation, event selection and complete untreated-event data.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "41883d32ff92b71f675de90839121d9895ae6f3744bda5d590d81825d4fef790", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-009", "title": "Biomimetic high-efficiency fog collector based on fractal spiral structure", "authors": "Liubin Li; Yihang Zhang; Xiaobo Wang; Yuxuan He; Ben Huang; Zhiguang Guo", "doi": "10.1016/j.jcis.2024.12.148", "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021979724030029", "version": "JCIS 683, Part 2 (2025), 39–48; PMID 39721406", "work_key": "10.1016/j.jcis.2024.12.148", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-009/", "reading_depth": "publisher-indexed abstract and excerpts", "review_scope": "Publisher-indexed abstract/excerpts and PubMed bibliographic identity checked through search; no complete-method review.", "access_limitation": "Complete methods and supplements were unavailable. The collection area, geometry, surface treatment and independent sample count remain unverified.", "next_access": "Use institutional library access or an authorized author manuscript. No purchase or author contact made.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": null, "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-010", "title": "Visible light leaves evaporation and interfacial structure of neat water unchanged at the air–water interface", "authors": "Chen et al.", "doi": "10.1073/pnas.2615377123", "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13598155/", "version": "Published article, 14 September 2026", "work_key": "10.1073/pnas.2615377123", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-010/", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "review_scope": "Selected Macroscopic evaporation results, Fig. 2 description and evaporation Methods; supporting interfacial discussion. No raw-data reanalysis.", "access_limitation": "Supplement download returned challenge HTML, not a PDF. Raw data and independent preparations not audited.", "next_access": "Retrieve SI Appendix through a lawful repository/library route; inspect public dataset DOI 10.17617/3.Q2GHPJ.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "66d01640d207d8c074e24bf0de498fb9345f4a79b7c66707552e407ac0bab9f7", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-011", "title": "Modifying natural droplet systems by charge injection", "authors": "R. G. Harrison; G. J. Marlton; M. H. P. Ambaum; K. A. Nicoll", "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L022050", "url": "https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/105035/9/PhysRevResearch.4.L022050.pdf", "version": "Published article, 31 May 2022", "work_key": "10.1103/physrevresearch.4.l022050", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/modifying-natural-droplet-systems-by-charge-injection-851b84c1/", "reading_depth": "main text and figures", "review_scope": "Theory, field apparatus, on/off sampling, Results, Table I and Figs. 3–4; discussion and conclusion.", "access_limitation": "Supplement and raw data not reviewed; no independent reanalysis.", "next_access": "Inspect the underlying time series and supplementary information before estimating a transferable effect.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "1993d1ffada3c1188e2d500a5075671fad34e368131d8b05098776928b87e1ce", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-012", "title": "Ionic Charge Emission Into Fog From a Remotely Piloted Aircraft", "authors": "R. G. Harrison; K. A. Nicoll; G. J. Marlton; D. J. Tilley; P. Iravani", "doi": "10.1029/2022GL099827", "url": "https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107287/8/Geophysical%20Research%20Letters%20-%202022%20-%20Harrison%20-%20Ionic%20Charge%20Emission%20Into%20Fog%20From%20a%20Remotely%20Piloted%20Aircraft.pdf", "version": "Published article, 5 October 2022", "work_key": "10.1029/2022gl099827", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/ionic-charge-emission-into-fog-from-a-remotely-piloted-aircraft-18183638/", "reading_depth": "main text and figures", "review_scope": "Aircraft and photodiode methods, Table 1, Sections 3–4 and Figs. 3–4; discussion and conclusions.", "access_limitation": "Supplement and raw time series not reviewed; charge currents were not accurately balanced in the experiment.", "next_access": "Audit flight-level controls, cloud evolution and optical normalization using the supplement and data.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "feee9318699419e3c0dd01a067c40a9d6b63450d7784880dbe7007cc9cc6a47a", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-013", "title": "Nudging a Pseudo-Science Towards a Science — The Role of Statistics in a Rainfall Enhancement Trial in Oman", "authors": "Ray Chambers; Stephen Beare; Scott Peak; Mohammed Al-Kalbani", "doi": "10.1111/insr.12486", "url": "https://documents.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/%40web/%40inf/%40math/documents/doc/uow270990.pdf", "version": "NIASRA Working Paper 21-21 (2021), predecessor to the 2022 journal article", "work_key": "10.1111/insr.12486", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/nudging-a-pseudoscience-towards-a-sciencethe-role-of-statistics-in-a-rainfall-enhance-434c7ccc/", "reading_depth": "selected original manuscript text and tables", "review_scope": "Trial design, Section 5 headline analysis, Tables 3–5 and conclusion; Table 5 visually checked on manuscript p. 39.", "access_limitation": "Published journal full text unavailable in this check. Working-paper and final-journal equivalence has not been established; underlying trial data not reanalyzed.", "next_access": "Compare the accepted or published version and inspect trial data, exposure definitions and bootstrap code.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "7d003ed0ebd22492575e80563d638cf59922568a13d0c4af0dd121ce09faf4cb", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-014", "title": "Bias-Adjusted Attribution Estimation for Rainfall Enhancement Trials", "authors": "Zhi Yang Tho; Raymond Chambers; A. H. Welsh", "doi": "10.48550/arXiv.2607.21991", "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.21991v1", "version": "arXiv v1, 24 July 2026; preprint, not journal peer reviewed", "work_key": "10.48550/arxiv.2607.21991", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/bias-adjusted-attribution-estimation-for-rainfall-enhancement-trials-arxiv260721991/", "reading_depth": "selected main text and tables", "review_scope": "Trial definition in Section 2, attribution discussion, Section 5, Table 3 and discussion of limitations. Numerical tables visually checked; derivation and simulation code not independently validated.", "access_limitation": "Historical trial data not independently reanalyzed; spatial dependence and model misspecification remain limitations discussed by the authors.", "next_access": "Inspect code and data; compare exposure definitions and spatial/model sensitivity. Treat new versions as the same lineage, not another trial.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "1b428794c643e615f97650c780da629034b337b346392af394fcdc25cbeb0f1d", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-015", "title": "Electrostatic fog water collection", "authors": "Diego Cruzat; Carlos Jerez-Hanckes", "doi": "10.1016/j.elstat.2018.10.009", "url": "https://repositorio.uc.cl/dspace/items/f8b09c4d-31e5-4f45-a1ea-5f228b195d37/full", "version": "2018 journal record; UC repository metadata only", "work_key": "10.1016/j.elstat.2018.10.009", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/electrostatic-fog-water-collection-2115e91a/", "reading_depth": "not yet read", "review_scope": "Bibliographic identity and restricted-access status only. No experimental result has been extracted.", "access_limitation": "Full paper not obtained. This is an access lead, not evidence for a collection gain.", "next_access": "Obtain an authorized author copy or publisher access, then read the outdoor methods, comparator, normalization, uncertainty and energy accounting.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "265a34e40af4386bf49e5b7a0ad22e3ec842980f2b9937ad589e56e7864281ef", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-016", "title": "Passive radiative cooling below ambient air temperature under direct sunlight", "authors": "Aaswath P. Raman; Marc Abou Anoma; Linxiao Zhu; Eden Rephaeli; Shanhui Fan", "doi": "10.1038/nature13883", "url": "https://web.stanford.edu/group/fan/publication/Raman_Nature_515_540_2014.pdf", "version": "Published Nature article, 27 November 2014, with Methods and Extended Data", "work_key": "10.1038/nature13883", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-016/", "reading_depth": "main result and methods", "review_scope": "Radiative balance, multilayer design, rooftop temperature results and Fig. 3; temperature-sensor and apparatus Methods.", "access_limitation": "Raw data and independent sample hierarchy not audited. Energy-saving projections are outside this case.", "next_access": "Review independent climatic replication and a complete condensation heat balance before translating cooling into a water yield.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "80dea78f72d31c8324a3806ef94755a3635b56ba0ad3647e6eff44f06fbb837e", "supplement_url": null, "supplement_sha256": null }, { "id": "SRC-017", "title": "Exploiting radiative cooling for uninterrupted 24-hour water harvesting from the atmosphere", "authors": "Iwan Haechler; Hyunchul Park; Gabriel Schnoering; Tobias Gulich; Mathieu Rohner; Abinash Tripathy; Athanasios Milionis; Thomas M. Schutzius; Dimos Poulikakos", "doi": "10.1126/sciadv.abf3978", "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8221617/", "version": "Published article, 23 June 2021, and ETH supplementary materials", "work_key": "10.1126/sciadv.abf3978", "related_versions": [], "canonical_paper_path": "/papers/atlas-src-017/", "reading_depth": "main results and supplementary methods", "review_scope": "Main-text heat balance and Fig. 2 comparison; Fig. 3 condensation experiments; supplementary dew-harvesting procedure, Table S1 and Fig. S12 proof-of-concept tests.", "access_limitation": "Raw data not reanalyzed. Chamber mass increase, modeled potential and ambient condensate collection are different measurements.", "next_access": "Audit field repeatability, net drained-water yield per occupied area and performance across humidity, wind and cloud cover.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "retrieved_sha256": "fe77d3114ae206a71605d33d49c67ee4e0cb4de61b5b1f1131a894fef24a6ed6", "supplement_url": "https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/server/api/core/bitstreams/a4052ac9-50f1-4378-98b6-51a6bae07596/content", "supplement_sha256": "b35cdd188fe56fa7883d4e7c059d20c23e7c499aeebc90acb466ce826229c3d6" } ], "studies": [ { "id": "STU-001", "source_ids": [ "SRC-001" ], "kind": "electronic spectroscopy", "independent_unit": null, "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "ARPES, STM and calculations belong to one publication; do not count methods as replications." }, { "id": "STU-002", "source_ids": [ "SRC-002" ], "kind": "field monitoring", "independent_unit": "Site/time series; repeated collector readings are not independent sites.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Low and High Santa Rosa share regional weather; model comparison uses these observations." }, { "id": "STU-003", "source_ids": [ "SRC-002" ], "kind": "resource model", "independent_unit": "Model scenario and calibration series.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "AMARU uses 2018 airport/Alto Patache inputs and is compared with Santa Rosa observations." }, { "id": "STU-004", "source_ids": [ "SRC-003" ], "kind": "molecular simulation", "independent_unit": "Seed trajectories/surface terminations; independence not audited.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "All arXiv versions are one work, not new experiments." }, { "id": "STU-005", "source_ids": [ "SRC-004" ], "kind": "surface experiment and simulation", "independent_unit": "Prepared crystal/cycle hierarchy unresolved.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Repeated deposition/desorption on a surface does not establish independent crystals." }, { "id": "STU-006", "source_ids": [ "SRC-005" ], "kind": "powder immersion freezing", "independent_unit": "Independently prepared suspension batch.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Triplicate batches reported; wells within each batch are nested measurements." }, { "id": "STU-007", "source_ids": [ "SRC-006" ], "kind": "chamber optical experiment", "independent_unit": "Fresh independent chamber preparation; count unresolved.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Sequential repeats used an unopened chamber; humidity accumulation reported." }, { "id": "STU-008", "source_ids": [ "SRC-007" ], "kind": "chamber droplet experiment", "independent_unit": "Independent preparation/run hierarchy unresolved.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Reported groups/readings are not an established independent sample size. Shared authors with SRC-008 do not prove shared data." }, { "id": "STU-009", "source_ids": [ "SRC-008" ], "kind": "atmospheric observation", "independent_unit": "Eligible weather event; allocation history unresolved.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Overlap with earlier Shi field publications unverified; no independent-study total." }, { "id": "STU-010", "source_ids": [ "SRC-009" ], "kind": "collector laboratory study", "independent_unit": null, "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "unresolved: methods unavailable", "shared_data": "Relationship to SSRN manuscript not checked; distinct from the 2021 leaf-skeleton paper." }, { "id": "STU-011", "source_ids": [ "SRC-010" ], "kind": "evaporation and spectroscopy", "independent_unit": "Independent preparation hierarchy unresolved.", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Light-off/on/off windows on one sample are paired measurements, not independent samples." }, { "id": "STU-012", "source_ids": [ "SRC-011" ], "kind": "natural-fog ground intervention", "independent_unit": "Fog event and on/off switching cycles", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "One detailed fog event; within-event scans and cycles are not independent field replications." }, { "id": "STU-013", "source_ids": [ "SRC-012" ], "kind": "aircraft charge-release field observation", "independent_unit": "Flight within meteorological event", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "One fog flight plus non-fog comparison flights; repeated charge sequences are nested within flights." }, { "id": "STU-014", "source_ids": [ "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "kind": "historical rainfall trial and statistical reanalysis", "independent_unit": "Gauge-day observations clustered within trial days", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Same Oman 2013–2018 trial data and overlapping authorship. The 2026 analysis is not an independent field replication." }, { "id": "STU-015", "source_ids": [ "SRC-016" ], "kind": "rooftop radiative-cooling measurement", "independent_unit": "Device/day, independent replication unresolved", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Continuous temperature readings in one illustrated rooftop run are not independent devices or sites." }, { "id": "STU-016", "source_ids": [ "SRC-017" ], "kind": "rooftop controlled-humidity condensation", "independent_unit": "Chamber run", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "Table S1 and Fig. 3 describe condensation runs; the 24-hour integration is not 24 independent tests." }, { "id": "STU-017", "source_ids": [ "SRC-017" ], "kind": "ambient-air condensate collection", "independent_unit": "Open-air proof-of-concept run", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "The 18-hour ambient run differs from the controlled-humidity runs; both belong to the same publication." }, { "id": "STU-018", "source_ids": [ "SRC-017" ], "kind": "modeled dew potential from cooling measurements", "independent_unit": "Measured cooling traces used as model inputs", "independent_n": null, "identity_status": "provisional episode identity", "shared_data": "The Fig. 2 comparison is calculated from subcooling, with condensation suppressed in the underlying measurement; it is not another water-collection experiment." } ], "claims": [ { "id": "CLM-001", "source_id": "SRC-001", "study_id": "STU-001", "title": "An interfacial electronic state", "assertion": "Spectroscopy supports hybridization between substrate conduction states and Yb orbitals; this is a fundamental electronic result.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43246-026-01332-5", "source_version": "Published article, 6 October 2026; retrieved 13 October 2026", "locator": "Results, Figs. 2–3; Methods: Sample preparation and Experiments", "method": "ARPES, supported by STM and DFT", "environment": "Prepared YbCu2/Cu(111) solid interface", "conditions": [ "Sputtered/annealed Cu; Yb deposition at 650 K.", "Key ARPES maps at 7 K; STM at 80 K in ultrahigh vacuum." ], "comparator": "Clean Cu(111); layer-resolved calculations.", "result": "Interfacial and intralayer heavy-fermion states distinguished.", "value": null, "units": null, "denominator": null, "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "positive within tested regime", "uncertainty": "No water exposure, droplet mass or Weatherhill application established.", "reading_depth": "selected main text and supplement", "access_limitation": "Raw datasets and a complete supplementary review are outstanding.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "ARPES, STM and calculations belong to one publication; do not count methods as replications.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-002", "source_id": "SRC-001", "study_id": "STU-001", "title": "Temperature belongs to the state", "assertion": "The cited coherence temperature concerns the intralayer 2D state; it is not a measured universal cutoff for the interface.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43246-026-01332-5", "source_version": "Published article, 6 October 2026; retrieved 13 October 2026", "locator": "Results, Fig. 4; Supplementary Note 5, Fig. S5", "method": "Temperature-dependent ARPES", "environment": "Same prepared solid interface", "conditions": [ "Supplement Fig. S5 spans 6–80 K." ], "comparator": "C1 versus C2 momentum trends.", "result": "Intralayer coherence temperature; interfacial temperature dependence differs.", "value": 30, "units": "K", "denominator": "Intralayer electronic state", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "state-specific", "uncertainty": "Interfacial transition temperature not assigned here.", "reading_depth": "selected main text and supplement", "access_limitation": "Raw datasets and a complete supplementary review are outstanding.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "ARPES, STM and calculations belong to one publication; do not count methods as replications.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-001" ] }, { "id": "CLM-003", "source_id": "SRC-002", "study_id": "STU-002", "title": "The monitored sites collected little water", "assertion": "Santa Rosa observations show poor collection at the tested locations.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1537058/full", "source_version": "Published HTML, 20 February 2025", "locator": "Sections 3.1–3.2; Table 1; 4.2.1–4.2.2 and Fig. 6", "method": "One-square-metre double Raschel SFCs; ten-minute logging", "environment": "Low/High Santa Rosa, Alto Hospicio", "conditions": [ "Low: 572 m; High: 683 m ASL.", "Table 1: Low Sep 2023–Oct 2024; High Oct 2023–Oct 2024." ], "comparator": "Two sites; no randomized intervention.", "result": "High-site observed bound is <0.2 L/m²/day in section 3.2 but <0.1 in 4.2.2; Low is reported null. Section 4.2.1 reports a June peak monthly total of 2.5 L/m².", "value": null, "units": "L/m²/day; L/m²/month", "denominator": "Collector mesh area; daily rate and monthly total are distinct", "result_state": "adverse", "result_direction": "low/near-null", "uncertainty": "The paired local modeled bound also differs: <1 L/m²/day in 3.2 versus <0.2 in 4.2.2. Definitions/averaging need the underlying series; no bound is selected for numerical decisions and no annual measured yield is reconstructed.", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "access_limitation": "Raw monitoring series, complete calibration record and AMARU companion methods not audited.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Low and High Santa Rosa share regional weather; model comparison uses these observations.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-002" ] }, { "id": "CLM-004", "source_id": "SRC-002", "study_id": "STU-003", "title": "Regional potential is a model", "assertion": "The regional daily yield used in the planning example is modeled, not measured urban production.", "evidence_type": "model", "source_url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1537058/full", "source_version": "Published HTML, 20 February 2025", "locator": "Section 3.2; Figs. 8–9; section 5.1 and Conclusion", "method": "AMARU with satellite/topographic constraints", "environment": "Higher-elevation areas surrounding Alto Hospicio", "conditions": [ "2018 airport/Alto Patache meteorology; 25% efficiency assumption." ], "comparator": "Alto Patache calibration and Santa Rosa comparison.", "result": "Illustrative modeled annual-average daily rate.", "value": 2.5, "units": "L/m²/day", "denominator": "SFC mesh area; modeled daily rate averaged over a year", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "modeled potential", "uncertainty": "Transfer from a site 65 km away remains uncertain; installation and storage forecasts need site data.", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "access_limitation": "Raw monitoring series, complete calibration record and AMARU companion methods not audited.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "AMARU uses 2018 airport/Alto Patache inputs and is compared with Santa Rosa observations.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-002" ] }, { "id": "CLM-005", "source_id": "SRC-003", "study_id": "STU-004", "title": "A simulation identifies a candidate face", "assertion": "The v4 model favors microcline (110) as an ice-nucleating template with initially cubic-rich clusters.", "evidence_type": "model", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.13402v4", "source_version": "arXiv:2511.13402v4, 25 June 2026; first posted 17 November 2025", "locator": "v4 Results: seeding and Fig. 3; Conclusions; Methods", "method": "SCAN-trained machine-learning potential; enhanced sampling and seeded MD", "environment": "Hydroxylated, flat model surfaces in water", "conditions": [ "Multiple crystallographic terminations compared.", "Model melting point 308 K; results expressed as supercooling." ], "comparator": "Other modeled faces/terminations.", "result": "A mechanistic prediction for targeted experimental comparison.", "value": null, "units": null, "denominator": "Simulation trajectories and critical clusters", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "positive modeled", "uncertainty": "Model melting point is not an experimental water phase boundary; cubic-rich nuclei do not redefine bulk equilibrium ice.", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "access_limitation": "Supplementary calculations and earlier version text not reviewed or compared.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "All arXiv versions are one work, not new experiments.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-006", "source_id": "SRC-004", "study_id": "STU-005", "title": "Terraces nucleate in a different regime", "assertion": "Microcline (001) terrace nucleation occurs in cryogenic vapor deposition; sanidine shows a stronger step-edge preference.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-76548-7", "source_version": "Published article, 25 August 2026", "locator": "Results, Figs. 2–4; Methods: AFM experiments", "method": "In-situ dynamic AFM; repeated deposition/desorption", "environment": "Cleaved (001) microcline and sanidine in UHV", "conditions": [ "Samples degassed, cleaved in situ; measured holder temperature 145 K.", "Microcline water-vapor saturation ratio approximately 2–5." ], "comparator": "Sanidine (001); random spatial-distribution reference.", "result": "Ice appears at both steps and bare microcline terraces.", "value": null, "units": null, "denominator": "Observed nucleation positions; repeated surface cycles", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "positive, regime-specific", "uncertainty": "Actual surface may be warmer than holder. Source data/supplement not reanalysed; not an atmospheric powder replication.", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "access_limitation": "Supplementary results and source data have not been independently audited.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Repeated deposition/desorption on a surface does not establish independent crystals.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-007", "source_id": "SRC-005", "study_id": "STU-006", "title": "Powders add composition and microtexture", "assertion": "Six feldspar powders show differing freezing spectra despite similar warm onset in concentrated suspensions.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5635/2026/acp-26-5635-2026.html", "source_version": "Published article, 24 April 2026", "locator": "Abstract; Experimental sections 2.1–2.4", "method": "TINA immersion-freezing assay", "environment": "Milled natural perthitic/anti-perthitic powders", "conditions": [ "3 µL droplets; cooling 0 to −30 °C at 1 °C/min.", "96 droplets per concentration; triplicate independent batches reported." ], "comparator": "Pure-water controls; concentrations and mineral compositions.", "result": "Texture/composition associations merit matched comparisons.", "value": null, "units": null, "denominator": "Droplets nested in prepared batches; no independent total derived", "result_state": "mixed", "result_direction": "heterogeneous", "uncertainty": "Mineralogy, accessible surface and concentration co-vary; this does not isolate crystal-face causation.", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "access_limitation": "Supplement and complete freezing spectra not reanalysed.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Triplicate batches reported; wells within each batch are nested measurements.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-008", "source_id": "SRC-006", "study_id": "STU-007", "title": "Optical recovery, with unresolved endpoints", "assertion": "The repository manuscript reports faster chamber optical recovery for selected acoustic frequencies.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/389759/2/389759.pdf", "source_version": "Glasgow repository manuscript 389759/2; PDF metadata 10 August 2026", "locator": "Manuscript Abstract; experimental setup/results pp. 4–5, Figs. 2–5", "method": "Received optical power; derived 835 nm attenuation and 2% contrast-range estimate, not standard photometric MOR", "environment": "1 m chamber; 1.2 m optical link", "conditions": [ "835 nm light; 115 dB SPL; fans stop before acoustic exposure." ], "comparator": "No acoustics; 50, 450 and 1200 Hz.", "result": "Abstract: 180→11 dB/km at 450 Hz in 7 min of acoustic action. Results/Fig. 5 describe an initial peak near 300 dB/km and a minimum of 8.5 dB/km after clearing; time and endpoint definitions remain unreconciled.", "value": null, "units": "dB/km", "denominator": "Derived path-normalized attenuation, not water delivered", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "positive report; numerical discrepancy unresolved", "uncertainty": "Endpoints/time origins not reconciled. Unopened repeats accumulated humidity; vibration can perturb optics.", "reading_depth": "selected manuscript text and figures", "access_limitation": "Journal-version text not compared. Abstract/result time origins and attenuation endpoints remain unreconciled.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Sequential repeats used an unopened chamber; humidity accumulation reported.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-003" ] }, { "id": "CLM-009", "source_id": "SRC-007", "study_id": "STU-008", "title": "Droplet response inside a chamber", "assertion": "The authors report droplet-size responses that depend on frequency and sound level.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.972648/full", "source_version": "Published HTML, 30 September 2022", "locator": "Abstract; Methods sections 2.1–2.3", "method": "Laser particle sizing and acoustic exposure", "environment": "Cylindrical chamber at 20 °C", "conditions": [ "30–280 Hz; 70–130 dB." ], "comparator": "With versus without acoustic action.", "result": "Reported response thresholds support further metrology review, not rainfall efficacy.", "value": null, "units": null, "denominator": "Size-distribution measurements; independent runs unresolved", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "positive report", "uncertainty": "Abstract reports 1,680 sets; Methods 2.3 reports 840 groups and >300,000 readings. Their accounting relationship is unresolved; none is accepted as independent n.", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "access_limitation": "Run allocation, independent preparations, serial dependence and the relation between abstract sets and methods groups are unresolved.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Reported groups/readings are not an established independent sample size. Shared authors with SRC-008 do not prove shared data.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-005" ] }, { "id": "CLM-010", "source_id": "SRC-008", "study_id": "STU-009", "title": "Rainfall attribution remains unresolved", "assertion": "Field observations cannot fully separate acoustic response from naturally changing precipitation.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/4/993", "source_version": "Published article, February 2023", "locator": "Section 3.1; Conclusions (i)–(iii) and final paragraph", "method": "Radar, radiometer, disdrometer and rain-gauge monitoring", "environment": "Source region of the Yellow River; monsoon precipitation", "conditions": [ "Forty-minute before/during/after windows described." ], "comparator": "Allocation procedure described; adequate randomized comparison evidence not established here.", "result": "No systematic cloud-system change; local droplet/rain variations reported.", "value": null, "units": "Qualitative", "denominator": null, "result_state": "inconclusive", "result_direction": "mixed/inconclusive", "uncertainty": "Authors call for more randomized comparisons; wind and terrain affect observations.", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "access_limitation": "Full allocation history and independence from related field reports not resolved; supplement not reviewed.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Overlap with earlier Shi field publications unverified; no independent-study total.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-011", "source_id": "SRC-009", "study_id": "STU-010", "title": "A bounded collector lead", "assertion": "Publisher excerpts report improved laboratory collection from a spiral/fractal-inspired structure with surface modification.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021979724030029", "source_version": "JCIS 683, Part 2 (2025), 39–48; PMID 39721406", "locator": "Publisher-indexed Abstract and Conclusions; JCIS 683 Pt 2, 39–48", "method": "Collection-rate measurement; complete method unavailable", "environment": "Laboratory; exact fog-flow conditions unknown", "conditions": [], "comparator": "Authors’ equivalent plane and unmodified structure; matching/area definitions unresolved.", "result": "Abstract reports up to 4.53× the plane and 1.81× the unmodified structure; headline maximum is unverified for design use.", "value": 0.29, "units": "g/min/cm²", "denominator": null, "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "positive attributed laboratory report", "uncertainty": "Coating, geometric dimensions, projected versus actual area, replication and delivery-to-storage losses unknown.", "reading_depth": "publisher-indexed abstract and excerpts", "access_limitation": "Complete methods and supplements were unavailable. The collection area, geometry, surface treatment and independent sample count remain unverified.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Relationship to SSRN manuscript not checked; distinct from the 2021 leaf-skeleton paper.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-004" ] }, { "id": "CLM-012", "source_id": "SRC-010", "study_id": "STU-011", "title": "A detectable enhancement was absent", "assertion": "Flat neat water showed no detectable evaporation enhancement under the tested visible illumination.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13598155/", "source_version": "Published article, 14 September 2026", "locator": "Results: Macroscopic evaporation; Fig. 2; Methods", "method": "Confocal interface-height tracking; supporting HD-SFG", "environment": "Milli-Q water, approximately 22.1 °C", "conditions": [ "450/532/635 nm; about 1000 W/m²; p-polarized, 45° incidence.", "Dry <0.1% RH and ambient ~27–36% RH." ], "comparator": "Paired 30-minute off/on/off windows.", "result": "No detected change; main text reports approximately 4.8% relative slope detection limit.", "value": null, "units": "Relative change", "denominator": "Evaporation slope normalized to dark baseline", "result_state": "null", "result_direction": "null within sensitivity", "uncertainty": "Not proof of zero effect or a universal statement about porous media; SI/raw-data audit remains outstanding.", "reading_depth": "selected main text", "access_limitation": "Supplement download returned challenge HTML, not a PDF. Raw data and independent preparations not audited.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Light-off/on/off windows on one sample are paired measurements, not independent samples.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-013", "source_id": "SRC-011", "study_id": "STU-012", "title": "Small droplets responded to charge", "assertion": "Negative charge injection increased the reported mass concentration in the 1.1 µm droplet bin by 95.3% during one natural-fog event.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/105035/9/PhysRevResearch.4.L022050.pdf", "source_version": "Published article, 31 May 2022", "locator": "Results, pp. L022050-3–4; Fig. 4, p. L022050-5; Table I", "method": "LOAC size distributions during alternating emitter-on/off windows; inner five minutes used to limit clock-drift effects.", "environment": "Sonning Farm, Reading, UK; natural fog on 15–16 March 2020", "conditions": [ "Four negative corona emitters; combined nominal current −2 nA.", "Ten-minute switching windows; detailed event drawn from a longer campaign." ], "comparator": "Emitter-off size-bin mass concentration during fog.", "result": "Bin-specific median mass-concentration comparison in Fig. 4; the abstract rounds the diameter to 1 µm.", "value": 95.3, "units": "%", "denominator": "Increase relative to emitter-off mass concentration in the 1.1 µm size bin", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "increase in the stated quantity", "uncertainty": "One event and one size bin; this is not a total-water, visibility or harvested-water gain. Fig. 4 shows bootstrapped off-condition median intervals, not an interval on this percentage.", "reading_depth": "main text and figures", "access_limitation": "Supplement and raw data not reviewed; no independent reanalysis.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "One detailed fog event; within-event scans and cycles are not independent field replications.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-014", "source_id": "SRC-012", "study_id": "STU-013", "title": "A transient optical response from a drone", "assertion": "Charge release during the fog flight was followed by an approximately 2% maximum increase in reflected light.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107287/8/Geophysical%20Research%20Letters%20-%202022%20-%20Harrison%20-%20Ionic%20Charge%20Emission%20Into%20Fog%20From%20a%20Remotely%20Piloted%20Aircraft.pdf", "source_version": "Published article, 5 October 2022", "locator": "Table 1; Sections 3–4; Figs. 3–4", "method": "Downward photodiode sampled reflected solar radiation during repeated charge sequences from a circling remotely piloted aircraft.", "environment": "UK field flights in February–March 2021; the fog flight occurred on 27 February", "conditions": [ "Aircraft circled at about 20 m height.", "Positive, negative and bipolar emission sequences; nominal emitter currents were not accurately balanced." ], "comparator": "Pre-activation light level and non-fog flights.", "result": "Maximum response was delayed by about 25 seconds; the paper relates roughly 0.5 W/m² to a 31 W/m² background.", "value": 2, "units": "approximately %", "denominator": "Reflected-light change relative to the background light level", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "increase in the stated quantity", "uncertainty": "One fog flight with repeated sequences; reflectivity is not transmission, meteorological visibility, water collection or rainfall.", "reading_depth": "main text and figures", "access_limitation": "Supplement and raw time series not reviewed; charge currents were not accurately balanced in the experiment.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "One fog flight plus non-fog comparison flights; repeated charge sequences are nested within flights.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-015", "source_id": "SRC-013", "study_id": "STU-014", "title": "The original Oman estimate has a specific statistic", "assertion": "The original Oman working paper reports positive rainfall attribution, with a 16.23% bootstrap mean in its headline analysis.", "evidence_type": "model", "source_url": "https://documents.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/%40web/%40inf/%40math/documents/doc/uow270990.pdf", "source_version": "NIASRA Working Paper 21-21 (2021), predecessor to the 2022 journal article", "locator": "NIASRA Working Paper 21-21, Section 5; Tables 4–5, manuscript p. 39 (PDF p. 40)", "method": "Mixed-model attribution and bootstrap inference applied to positive-rainfall observations from the ionizer trial.", "environment": "Hajar Mountains, Oman; 2013–2018 ionization trial", "conditions": [ "Daily randomized on/off operating schedule; exposure assigned using wind-dependent downwind corridors.", "4,168 downwind gauge-day observations with positive rainfall in the headline model." ], "comparator": "Estimated natural rainfall without ionizer influence, constructed statistically.", "result": "Table 5 gives a bootstrap mean of 16.23%, with 2.5th–97.5th percentiles of 10.10–23.09%; these are not a directly measured regional rainfall gain.", "value": 16.23, "units": "% (bootstrap mean)", "denominator": "Attributed rainfall as a percentage of estimated natural rainfall", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "increase in the stated quantity", "uncertainty": "Working-paper version checked; final-journal equivalence remains unverified. A bootstrap mean is not directly comparable to the reanalysis point estimate.", "reading_depth": "selected original manuscript text and tables", "access_limitation": "Published journal full text unavailable in this check. Working-paper and final-journal equivalence has not been established; underlying trial data not reanalyzed.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Same Oman 2013–2018 trial data and overlapping authorship. The 2026 analysis is not an independent field replication.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-006" ] }, { "id": "CLM-016", "source_id": "SRC-014", "study_id": "STU-014", "title": "Reanalysis reduces the estimated attribution", "assertion": "The 2026 reanalysis estimates 6.68% attribution, compared with 12.52% from the earlier estimator applied within the same analysis.", "evidence_type": "model", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.21991v1", "source_version": "arXiv v1, 24 July 2026; preprint, not journal peer reviewed", "locator": "arXiv v1, Section 2; Section 5 pp. 13–14; Table 3 p. 15; Discussion", "method": "Observation-specific adjustment for back-transformation bias; PREB bootstrap uncertainty for a linear mixed model.", "environment": "Reanalysis of the same Oman 2013–2018 trial", "conditions": [ "4,168 positive-rainfall downwind gauge-day observations.", "Gauge-day observations are clustered within days; exposure and natural rainfall depend on the statistical model." ], "comparator": "Earlier attribution estimator recomputed on the same analysis data.", "result": "Point estimate 6.68%; bootstrap 95% interval 2.21–12.88%. Both estimators indicate a positive effect under the model. Table 3 separately lists a 7.36% bootstrap mean for the new estimator.", "value": 6.68, "units": "% (point estimate)", "denominator": "Attributed rainfall divided by modeled natural rainfall over the analyzed positive-rainfall observations", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "increase in the stated quantity", "uncertainty": "A preprint reanalysis with overlapping authorship, not an independent trial or a guaranteed regional gain. Spatial dependence and model misspecification remain open sensitivity questions.", "reading_depth": "selected main text and tables", "access_limitation": "Historical trial data not independently reanalyzed; spatial dependence and model misspecification remain limitations discussed by the authors.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Same Oman 2013–2018 trial data and overlapping authorship. The 2026 analysis is not an independent field replication.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-006" ] }, { "id": "CLM-017", "source_id": "SRC-016", "study_id": "STU-015", "title": "A surface stayed cooler in direct sun", "assertion": "A photonic surface stayed 4.9 °C below ambient air temperature during the reported midday interval in direct sunlight.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://web.stanford.edu/group/fan/publication/Raman_Nature_515_540_2014.pdf", "source_version": "Published Nature article, 27 November 2014, with Methods and Extended Data", "locator": "Main text p. 542; Fig. 3; Methods: outdoor thermal measurement", "method": "Multilayer radiative emitter with a reflective solar response, measured by resistance temperature detectors inside a wind-shielded rooftop apparatus.", "environment": "Stanford, California; clear winter day", "conditions": [ "13:00–14:00 local time; solar irradiance 800–870 W/m².", "An infrared-transparent film and insulated air pocket limited nonradiative heat gains." ], "comparator": "Shaded ambient-air temperature; aluminium and black-paint samples in equivalent apparatus.", "result": "Reported temperature difference 4.9 ± 0.15 °C; Methods state ±0.15 °C sensor accuracy. This is not a confidence interval from independent rooftop replications.", "value": 4.9, "units": "°C below ambient", "denominator": "Ambient-air temperature minus sample temperature", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "lower surface temperature than ambient", "uncertainty": "Cooling was measured, not water production. Condensation also needs the surface below the dew point and sufficient heat rejection during condensation.", "reading_depth": "main result and methods", "access_limitation": "Raw data and independent sample hierarchy not audited. Energy-saving projections are outside this case.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Continuous temperature readings in one illustrated rooftop run are not independent devices or sites.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [] }, { "id": "CLM-018", "source_id": "SRC-017", "study_id": "STU-016", "title": "Day-and-night condensation in a humid chamber", "assertion": "A 24-hour rooftop chamber run averaged 19.3 g/m²/h of condensation, equivalent to about 0.46 L/m² over that run.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8221617/", "source_version": "Published article, 23 June 2021, and ETH supplementary materials", "locator": "Main Fig. 3; Supplement: Procedure for dew harvesting experiments, Table S1 (ETH PDF p. 26)", "method": "Balance measured condensate mass on the cooled emitter; chamber humidity maintained by salt solutions.", "environment": "ETH Zurich rooftop; 26–27 August 2019; controlled-humidity chamber", "conditions": [ "High relative humidity above 90%, maintained inside the chamber; no fog required.", "24 hours starting 09:44; mean solar irradiance 273 W/m² in Table S1." ], "comparator": "Elapsed-time mass measurement; this run did not directly compare collected water with an ordinary dew collector.", "result": "Table S1 reports 19.3 g/m²/h. Conversion: 19.3 × 24 = 463.2 g/m², approximately 0.463 L/m² using water density ≈1 kg/L. This is condenser-area normalization and mass formed on the surface.", "value": 19.3, "units": "g/m²/h", "denominator": "Condensed mass per emitter area per hour, averaged over the measured 24 hours", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "increase in the stated quantity", "uncertainty": "Humidity was controlled; this is not an ambient-air daily yield or a measurement of water drained into a reservoir. Do not extrapolate the run to annual output.", "reading_depth": "main results and supplementary methods", "access_limitation": "Raw data not reanalyzed. Chamber mass increase, modeled potential and ambient condensate collection are different measurements.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "Table S1 and Fig. 3 describe condensation runs; the 24-hour integration is not 24 independent tests.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-007" ] }, { "id": "CLM-019", "source_id": "SRC-017", "study_id": "STU-017", "title": "Ambient air also supplied collected condensate", "assertion": "A separate open-air test collected passively removed condensate through the night and into the following day.", "evidence_type": "observation", "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8221617/", "source_version": "Published article, 23 June 2021, and ETH supplementary materials", "locator": "Supplement: Proof-of-concept outdoor experiments; Fig. S12C–D (ETH PDF p. 24)", "method": "Coated underside exposed to ambient humid air; a dish beneath it received self-removed water.", "environment": "ETH Zurich rooftop; 14 October 2020, 17:00 to 15 October, 11:00", "conditions": [ "18-hour run; mean ambient relative humidity 83%.", "Condenser was exposed through an opening in the supporting box; no supplied fog." ], "comparator": "Qualitative proof of collection in ambient air, not a matched comparative-yield trial.", "result": "The supplement shows collected condensate from the 18-hour ambient run; no daily yield is inferred here.", "value": null, "units": "collected condensate", "denominator": "No area-normalized yield extracted for this proof-of-concept run", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "increase in the stated quantity", "uncertainty": "An 18-hour demonstration does not establish a 24-hour ambient yield, climatic reliability or drinkability.", "reading_depth": "main results and supplementary methods", "access_limitation": "Raw data not reanalyzed. Chamber mass increase, modeled potential and ambient condensate collection are different measurements.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "The 18-hour ambient run differs from the controlled-humidity runs; both belong to the same publication.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-007" ] }, { "id": "CLM-020", "source_id": "SRC-017", "study_id": "STU-018", "title": "The collector comparison is calculated potential", "assertion": "At an assumed 90% relative humidity, the paper calculates 85% more potential dew than OPUR foil from measured cooling performance.", "evidence_type": "model", "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8221617/", "source_version": "Published article, 23 June 2021, and ETH supplementary materials", "locator": "Main text: Heat flux analysis and atmospheric radiation shield design; Fig. 2F–G", "method": "Measured subcooling with condensation suppressed is converted to theoretically achievable dew using the heat balance and assumed humidity.", "environment": "Rooftop cooling measurements used as inputs to a dew-potential calculation", "conditions": [ "Constant relative humidity of 90% for this comparison.", "Underlying Fig. 2 measurements prevented condensation; latent heat had to be modeled." ], "comparator": "OPUR dew-collection foil under the same comparison framework.", "result": "85% greater calculated condensate potential at 90% RH; the comparison is not measured collected-water output.", "value": 85, "units": "% calculated increase", "denominator": "Calculated dew potential relative to OPUR foil at assumed 90% RH", "result_state": "positive", "result_direction": "increase in the stated quantity", "uncertainty": "The advantage is modeled from cooling traces. It does not show 85% more water collected in an outdoor head-to-head trial.", "reading_depth": "main results and supplementary methods", "access_limitation": "Raw data not reanalyzed. Chamber mass increase, modeled potential and ambient condensate collection are different measurements.", "reviewer": "Codex assisted extraction; no independent scientific sign-off", "review_date": "2026-10-13", "independence": "The Fig. 2 comparison is calculated from subcooling, with condensation suppressed in the underlying measurement; it is not another water-collection experiment.", "decision_use": false, "correction_ids": [ "COR-007" ] } ], "cases": [ { "id": "CASE-001", "slug": "atomic-interface", "title": "An electronic discovery, before an application", "summary": "Start at the atomic interface. Keep a new electronic state scientifically interesting while asking what, if anything, connects it to water or an instrument.", "domain_ids": [ "D01" ], "function": "fundamental research", "function_tags": [ "fundamental research", "sensing/measurement" ], "claim_ids": [ "CLM-001", "CLM-002" ], "source_ids": [ "SRC-001" ], "question_id": "Q-001", "boundary": "Electronic effective mass does not make fog droplets heavier. No transfer to water is demonstrated.", "tool_paths": [] }, { "id": "CASE-002", "slug": "alto-hospicio", "title": "A site measurement is not a regional forecast", "summary": "Keep the unfavorable observations in view. They change the disposition of the tested sites without eliminating an unvalidated resource lead at higher elevations.", "domain_ids": [ "D09", "D10" ], "function": "water collection / forecasting", "function_tags": [ "water collection", "resource assessment" ], "claim_ids": [ "CLM-003", "CLM-004" ], "source_ids": [ "SRC-002" ], "question_id": "Q-002", "boundary": "Deprioritize installation at the tested points. Higher-elevation leads require new observations before capacity or storage commitments.", "tool_paths": [ "/programs/fogfarm/" ] }, { "id": "CASE-003", "slug": "feldspar", "title": "Same mineral family. Different physical tests.", "summary": "A molecular model, a cryogenic surface experiment and a powder assay ask related questions at different scales. Their differences are useful experimental targets.", "domain_ids": [ "D02", "D03", "D05", "D10" ], "function": "fundamental research", "function_tags": [ "fundamental research", "sensing/measurement" ], "claim_ids": [ "CLM-005", "CLM-006", "CLM-007" ], "source_ids": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "question_id": "Q-003", "boundary": "Preserve face, preparation, phase, supersaturation and temperature. Cross-regime agreement or disagreement is not automatic replication or refutation.", "tool_paths": [ "/science/" ] }, { "id": "CASE-004", "slug": "acoustics", "title": "From chamber response to atmospheric attribution", "summary": "Optical recovery, droplet-size redistribution and rainfall are different outcomes. A credible connection needs control of the physical exposure and the measurement.", "domain_ids": [ "D07", "D09", "D10" ], "function": "intervention / sensing", "function_tags": [ "physical intervention", "sensing/measurement" ], "claim_ids": [ "CLM-008", "CLM-009", "CLM-010" ], "source_ids": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "question_id": "Q-004", "boundary": "No field water-production benefit is established here. Chamber measurements do not authorize atmospheric deployment.", "tool_paths": [ "/tools/extinction/", "/tools/bias-budget/", "/tools/sample-planner/" ] }, { "id": "CASE-005", "slug": "fractal-collectors", "title": "Test the geometry, measure the delivered water", "summary": "Pin the correct spiral-collector paper, then separate a design idea from the evidence required to choose a collector.", "domain_ids": [ "D03" ], "function": "water collection", "function_tags": [ "water collection" ], "claim_ids": [ "CLM-011" ], "source_ids": [ "SRC-009" ], "question_id": "Q-005", "boundary": "This is the 2025 fractal spiral paper, not the 2021 leaf-skeleton paper. A combined coating/shape result does not isolate a fractal advantage, establish field yield or provide patent clearance.", "tool_paths": [ "/programs/fogfarm/", "/tools/airflow/" ] }, { "id": "CASE-006", "slug": "null-result", "title": "A null result is a boundary worth mapping", "summary": "An experiment that does not detect the proposed response narrows the next question. Keep the detection limit and tested system attached to the finding.", "domain_ids": [ "D02", "D06", "D10" ], "function": "fundamental research / measurement", "function_tags": [ "fundamental research", "sensing/measurement" ], "claim_ids": [ "CLM-012" ], "source_ids": [ "SRC-010" ], "question_id": "Q-006", "boundary": "The result concerns a neat planar air–water interface. A smaller effect, another material, geometry or timescale remains a different question.", "tool_paths": [ "/tools/bias-budget/", "/tools/paired-analysis/" ] }, { "id": "CASE-007", "slug": "electric-charge", "title": "Electric charge: droplets, light and rainfall", "summary": "Charge can alter small-droplet populations and optical signals. Rainfall attribution is a separate, model-dependent question; collected fog water needs its own evidence.", "domain_ids": [ "D04", "D09", "D10" ], "function": "physical intervention / measurement", "function_tags": [ "physical intervention", "sensing/measurement" ], "claim_ids": [ "CLM-013", "CLM-014", "CLM-015", "CLM-016" ], "source_ids": [ "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015" ], "question_id": "Q-007", "boundary": "The Harrison studies measure droplet or optical responses. The two Oman analyses share one trial lineage and infer rainfall attribution statistically. None measures fog-water collection. Cruzat and Jerez-Hanckes (2018), the collection lead, is not yet read; no numerical gain from it is used.", "tool_paths": [ "/tools/paired-analysis/", "/tools/bias-budget/" ] }, { "id": "CASE-008", "slug": "light-and-dew", "title": "Light and dew: cooling a surface, condensing vapor", "summary": "A surface can reflect sunlight and radiate heat to the sky. If it cools below the dew point, water vapor can condense—even without fog.", "domain_ids": [ "D03", "D05", "D06", "D10" ], "function": "fundamental research / water collection", "function_tags": [ "fundamental research", "water collection" ], "claim_ids": [ "CLM-017", "CLM-018", "CLM-019", "CLM-020" ], "source_ids": [ "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "question_id": "Q-008", "boundary": "This is condensation from humid air, not interception of suspended fog droplets or illumination-driven fog clearing. Cooling, modeled dew potential, chamber condensation and water collected in ambient air are separate results.", "tool_paths": [ "/tools/bias-budget/" ] } ], "questions": [ { "id": "Q-001", "case_id": "CASE-001", "question": "Which measurable property could connect this interface to an external interface or instrument?", "possibility": "Understand whether tunable electronic coupling yields a useful observable before proposing an application.", "established_claim_ids": [ "CLM-001", "CLM-002" ], "missing_connection": "No demonstrated coupling to water, ambient operation or sensing performance.", "alternatives": [ "Ordinary surface electronic structure or adsorption effects.", "A simpler material with a measurable interfacial response." ], "next_action": "Review the remaining supplement and identify a candidate observable, its operating envelope and a falsifying control.", "decision_criterion": "Continue only if a specific measurable coupling and an appropriate comparison can be articulated; otherwise retain as fundamental discovery.", "status": "research lead", "scientific_interest": "Interfacial correlations and state-selective behavior.", "evidence_strength": "Spectroscopy supports the electronic finding; transfer remains unevidenced.", "experimental_tractability": "Specialist surface-science review first.", "application_readiness": "No established Weatherhill application.", "implementation_conditions": "Qualified materials expertise and a bounded measurement proposal before any physical test.", "connection_type": "open question" }, { "id": "Q-002", "case_id": "CASE-002", "question": "Which observations are needed before an installation or storage forecast?", "possibility": "Test whether a higher-elevation resource survives a full seasonal measurement cycle.", "established_claim_ids": [ "CLM-003", "CLM-004" ], "missing_connection": "Site-specific water delivered, downtime, seasonal availability and quality.", "alternatives": [ "Different elevation/exposure.", "Conventional supply or demand reduction." ], "next_action": "Prepare a site-monitoring specification covering a full seasonal cycle, calibration, mesh area, missing data, meteorology and storage delivery.", "decision_criterion": "Advance to forecasting only when representative site observations and uncertainty support the stated service requirement; otherwise revise or reject the site.", "status": "awaiting site-specific observations", "scientific_interest": "Atmospheric resource heterogeneity.", "evidence_strength": "Direct unfavorable site evidence; regional model requires validation.", "experimental_tractability": "Standard monitoring is conceptually tractable; access/operator unresolved.", "application_readiness": "Tested points deprioritized; regional lead unvalidated.", "implementation_conditions": "Site permission, operator, water-quality plan, bounded resources and recorded approval.", "connection_type": "proposed transfer" }, { "id": "Q-003", "case_id": "CASE-003", "question": "Which matched comparison separates face, preparation and nucleation regime?", "possibility": "Connect molecular templates to controlled nucleation behavior without erasing scale differences.", "established_claim_ids": [ "CLM-005", "CLM-006", "CLM-007" ], "missing_connection": "A comparison holding mineral identity and preparation fixed across relevant conditions.", "alternatives": [ "Step density and rare defects.", "Surface hydroxylation, microtexture or accessible area.", "Water model and supersaturation dependence." ], "next_action": "Build a source comparison sheet from supplements, then specify one matched face/preparation comparison with measured supersaturation and independent preparations.", "decision_criterion": "Prefer an explanation only if it predicts a discriminating contrast that remains after the principal confounders are controlled.", "status": "ready for deeper review", "scientific_interest": "Molecular ordering and heterogeneous phase transitions.", "evidence_strength": "Complementary observations and a versioned model; no single universal mechanism established.", "experimental_tractability": "Requires mineral characterization and qualified nucleation metrology.", "application_readiness": "No field intervention established.", "implementation_conditions": "Review phase/temperature comparability, measurement limits and independent-unit definitions.", "connection_type": "open question" }, { "id": "Q-004", "case_id": "CASE-004", "question": "What would separate an acoustic effect from natural clearing or instrument drift?", "possibility": "Determine whether a local response persists with controlled exposure and mechanically isolated measurement.", "established_claim_ids": [ "CLM-008", "CLM-009", "CLM-010" ], "missing_connection": "Independent, randomized fresh preparations with measured acoustic field and direct endpoint.", "alternatives": [ "Natural settling or evaporation.", "Humidity accumulation, airflow changes and optical vibration." ], "next_action": "First reconcile Cameron’s version and time axes; then draft a randomized acoustic/sham measurement-qualification plan with fresh preparations, blinded analysis and a physical endpoint.", "decision_criterion": "Propose a test only after the optical instrument passes vibration/drift controls; advance a mechanism if a repeatable contrast survives sham and environmental controls.", "status": "awaiting manuscript reconciliation", "scientific_interest": "Coupled acoustic, droplet and optical dynamics.", "evidence_strength": "Chamber response reported; numerical discrepancy and field attribution unresolved.", "experimental_tractability": "Bounded chamber work is conceivable after measurement qualification.", "application_readiness": "No atmospheric rainfall or water-yield readiness.", "implementation_conditions": "Acoustic exposure review, qualified operator, bounded resources and recorded approval; WX-FOG-001 remains unchanged.", "connection_type": "open question" }, { "id": "Q-005", "case_id": "CASE-005", "question": "Does the feature improve water delivered to storage against a matched simpler structure?", "possibility": "Isolate whether geometry changes capture, drainage or retained water.", "established_claim_ids": [ "CLM-011" ], "missing_connection": "Complete methods, matched area/coating comparator and storage-delivery measurement.", "alternatives": [ "Simple wires or mesh with identical coating.", "Coating effect, area convention or drainage losses rather than fractal geometry." ], "next_action": "Obtain lawful full-text/supplement access and extract geometry, treatment, airflow, area normalization and collection endpoint before specifying a factorial comparison.", "decision_criterion": "Retain the feature only if a geometry effect can be distinguished from treatment and area conventions with a delivery endpoint; do not choose hardware from the abstract ratio.", "status": "awaiting full methods", "scientific_interest": "Branching, curvature and water transport.", "evidence_strength": "Publisher excerpt only; substantial method gaps.", "experimental_tractability": "Comparator cannot yet be specified responsibly.", "application_readiness": "Research lead, not a field-yield or procurement specification.", "implementation_conditions": "Access first; later disclosure/IP review of any proposed implementation; no patent clearance implied.", "connection_type": "proposed transfer" }, { "id": "Q-006", "case_id": "CASE-006", "question": "Does the null identify an operating limit or a measurement mismatch?", "possibility": "Use a constrained null to design a sharper comparison of optical and thermal explanations.", "established_claim_ids": [ "CLM-012" ], "missing_connection": "Raw-data/supplement audit and comparison across interfaces with matched thermal and geometric boundaries.", "alternatives": [ "Photothermal or porous-geometry effects.", "Effects below detection or outside tested timescales." ], "next_action": "Retrieve the SI and public dataset, check fit uncertainty and independent preparations, then compare illumination, heat balance and measurement geometry across the disputed literature.", "decision_criterion": "Treat the finding as a useful bound if the detection limit and controls withstand review; a new experiment should resolve a stated discrepancy within measurable sensitivity.", "status": "ready for deeper review", "scientific_interest": "Light–water interaction and measurement sensitivity.", "evidence_strength": "Source-backed null in a defined regime; no universal zero-effect claim.", "experimental_tractability": "Reading/data audit precedes any optical test.", "application_readiness": "No evaporation-device performance claim.", "implementation_conditions": "Qualified optical metrology, thermal controls, laser review, bounded resources and recorded approval.", "connection_type": "open question" }, { "id": "Q-007", "case_id": "CASE-007", "question": "When does a charge response become a useful fog outcome?", "possibility": "Connect charge, droplet size and optical measurements to a separately measured water or visibility outcome.", "established_claim_ids": [ "CLM-013", "CLM-014", "CLM-015", "CLM-016" ], "missing_connection": "The droplet and reflectivity responses do not establish collected water or improved visibility. The closest collection lead remains unread; rainfall attribution has a different scale and denominator.", "alternatives": [ "Size redistribution or slower evaporation without useful water removal.", "Changing background fog or illumination; instrument response to charged particles.", "Statistical exposure or model assumptions affecting rainfall attribution." ], "next_action": "Read the Cruzat paper once an authorized copy is available. Audit the Harrison data and Oman model sensitivity, keeping optical, collected-water and rainfall endpoints separate.", "decision_criterion": "Choose a bounded next study only when the primary endpoint, comparator, independent unit and uncertainty can be measured without borrowing an effect size from a different endpoint.", "status": "source-backed; collection evidence still incomplete", "scientific_interest": "How electrical charge alters droplets across laboratory and atmospheric scales.", "evidence_strength": "Natural-fog responses and one rainfall-trial lineage; no transferable collection gain established.", "experimental_tractability": "Document and data review can proceed now; a controlled measurement proposal would require separate design review.", "application_readiness": "No Weatherhill charge system, field deployment or performance guarantee established.", "implementation_conditions": "Any later physical proposal needs qualified electrical and emissions review, environmental and site permissions, instrument qualification and explicit experimental approval.", "connection_type": "open question" }, { "id": "Q-008", "case_id": "CASE-008", "question": "How much condensate can be collected from ambient air reliably?", "possibility": "Measure net drained water from a radiatively cooled surface while retaining a complete heat and moisture balance.", "established_claim_ids": [ "CLM-017", "CLM-018", "CLM-019", "CLM-020" ], "missing_connection": "A chamber condensation rate and a modeled collector advantage do not establish sustained ambient-air collection across climates.", "alternatives": [ "Cloud cover, humidity or wind removes the cooling margin.", "Condensate forms but remains on the surface or re-evaporates.", "Large radiative shields reduce yield per occupied area despite favorable emitter-area normalization." ], "next_action": "Review the underlying data, then define a side-by-side ambient-air measurement of net collected mass, dew point, sky conditions and total footprint against a conventional collector.", "decision_criterion": "Advance only if a measured net-water advantage survives matched conditions, independent-day analysis and separate accounting for condenser area and occupied area.", "status": "ready for a bounded measurement proposal", "scientific_interest": "Radiative heat rejection coupled to phase change and passive condensate removal.", "evidence_strength": "Measured cooling, chamber condensation and an ambient proof of collection; comparative yield remains modeled.", "experimental_tractability": "Temperature, humidity and gravimetric measurements are accessible; reliable controls and climatic replication remain necessary.", "application_readiness": "No annual water yield, potable-water claim or ready-to-sell Weatherhill device established.", "implementation_conditions": "A later proposal needs calibrated balances and thermal sensors, contamination controls, weather exposure assessment, site permission and approval of its experimental scope.", "connection_type": "proposed transfer" } ], "corrections": [ { "id": "COR-001", "date": "2026-10-13", "claim_ids": [ "CLM-002" ], "status": "corrected in this release", "note": "State-specific coherence replaces the inherited blanket interface-temperature restriction. Main paper and Supplementary Note 5 checked." }, { "id": "COR-002", "date": "2026-10-13", "claim_ids": [ "CLM-003", "CLM-004" ], "status": "corrected; underlying bounds unresolved", "note": "Separated measured collection from regional modeled potential and checked monitoring dates against Table 1. The different observed and modeled local bounds in sections 3.2 and 4.2.2 remain unresolved; none is selected as a numerical planning input." }, { "id": "COR-003", "date": "2026-10-13", "claim_ids": [ "CLM-008" ], "status": "open discrepancy", "note": "Inspected repository manuscript text and rendered figures. Abstract/result endpoints and timing remain unreconciled; no numerical performance input accepted." }, { "id": "COR-004", "date": "2026-10-13", "claim_ids": [ "CLM-011" ], "status": "identity pinned; access gap open", "note": "Pinned the exact spiral-collector DOI and kept the leaf-skeleton work distinct. Excerpt access is not a full-method review." }, { "id": "COR-005", "date": "2026-10-13", "claim_ids": [ "CLM-009" ], "status": "sample accounting unresolved", "note": "Recorded both the abstract’s 1,680 sets and Methods 2.3’s 840 groups. These may reflect different accounting units; their relationship and independent sample count are unresolved." }, { "id": "COR-006", "date": "2026-10-13", "claim_ids": [ "CLM-015", "CLM-016" ], "status": "statistic and lineage clarified", "note": "The original manuscript’s 16.23% is a bootstrap mean. The 2026 reanalysis compares point estimates of 12.52% and 6.68%; its bootstrap mean is separately 7.36%. These must not be presented as a like-for-like 16.23% → 6.68% correction. Both papers analyze the same Oman trial lineage." }, { "id": "COR-007", "date": "2026-10-13", "claim_ids": [ "CLM-018", "CLM-019", "CLM-020" ], "status": "condensation conditions and comparison clarified", "note": "The approximately 0.46 L/m² conversion belongs to a 24-hour controlled-humidity chamber run. The ambient-air proof of collection lasted 18 hours. The OPUR comparison is calculated dew potential derived from cooling measurements, not a measured collection-yield advantage." } ], "counts": { "cases": 8, "source_records": 17, "source_works": 17, "claims": 20, "research_directions": 8, "independent_studies": null }, "count_definitions": { "cases": "Editorial evidence cases; a case may contain several papers and study episodes.", "source_records": "Public versioned source records.", "source_works": "Deduplicated by canonical DOI; related arXiv versions are one work.", "independent_studies": "Uncomputed: episode identities, shared data and independent units remain unresolved.", "claims": "Public bounded assertions; not an efficacy or replication count.", "research_directions": "Open questions linked to cases; not approved experiments." }, "record_sha256": "05d5144501fd073e2f6aba3d4af90a0e2a82d3399a09b935edcc37b0d9f2e83f" }