What this source contributes.
Santa Rosa observations show poor collection at the tested locations. High-site observed bound is <0.2 L/m²/day in section 3.2 but <0.1 in 4.2.2; Low is reported null. Section 4.2.1 reports a June peak monthly total of 2.5 L/m². Limit: The paired local modeled bound also differs: <1 L/m²/day in 3.2 versus <0.2 in 4.2.2. Definitions/averaging need the underlying series; no bound is selected for numerical decisions and no annual measured yield is reconstructed. The regional daily yield used in the planning example is modeled, not measured urban production. Illustrative modeled annual-average daily rate. Limit: Transfer from a site 65 km away remains uncertain; installation and storage forecasts need site data.
selected main text. Methods 3.1–3.2, Table 1; Results 4.2.1–4.2.2 and figure descriptions; 5.1 and Conclusion. Selected original HTML passages read. Raw monitoring series, complete calibration record and AMARU companion methods not audited. Review date: 2026-10-13. AI-assisted source check; not independent replication.
Read the connected Atlas case →
Primary material consulted
This is a bounded reading note. It is not independent replication, a full systematic review or an endorsement of every conclusion in the paper.
Questions to take to the paper
- Which wet sizes contribute most to attenuation?
- Does a change persist after temperature, humidity and inlet conditions are accounted for?
- Is the measurement representative of the volume people need to see through?
A simulation, chamber result, field observation and operational outcome answer different questions. Record the comparator, measured quantity and conditions before carrying a result into a design.
Bibliographic provenance
Verified 2026-10-13 against the publisher-deposited Crossref metadata. Publication dates retain the precision supplied by the publisher. Metadata may reflect digital republication; it is not always the earliest historical publication date.