Know your
weather readiness.
One score. Five pillars. The evidence and actions behind every point. See where essential services are prepared—and where the gaps remain.
READINESS INDEX · EVIDENCE FIRSTSynthetic example · not a facility rating
AI-GENERATED CONCEPT ART · NO DEPLOYMENT SHOWN
Your facility’s readiness.
In one inspectable number.
What can keep running? What has been tested? What still depends on an assumption?
Weatherhill Score turns a defined assessment into a 0–100 readiness index, five pillar scores and a visible action list. Start with the site, its essential function and the evidence. Keep weather exposure alongside the score.
A readiness index is not a probability of avoiding damage. The current pilot uses a fixed general-facility profile and requires qualified review before a customer rating.
From a site assessment
to a decision you can defend.
Every point follows the published rubric. Every gap stays in the record.
Assess
Define the site and essential service. Review records, inspections and performance tests.
Score
Assess 30 controls across five weighted pillars. Missing evidence stays unknown.
Flag
Keep absent, partial and demonstrated capabilities visible. Critical gaps never disappear into an average.
Act
Assign the next action, owner and due date. Reassess as evidence and capabilities change.
See what moves the score.
Fixed pilot weights. Six controls per pillar. An evidence trail behind each assessment.
Detection and decisions
Can you see the hazard, receive the alert and make the right decision?
Explore the rubric ↗Physical protection
Are essential assets protected, inspected and maintained?
Explore the rubric ↗Continuity and dependencies
Can power, water, communications and access support the required service?
Explore the rubric ↗Response and people
Do people know their roles—and have they exercised the response?
Explore the rubric ↗Recovery and improvement
Can the facility restore service, close findings and keep evidence current?
Explore the rubric ↗The number. The gaps.
The next move.
Switch between two invented records. Readiness changes; the example’s fog exposure stays the same.
Start with the evidence.
A reviewed failure counts as evidence. An unanswered question does not. Coverage tells you how much of the assessment is supported.
What counts as evidence ↗Invented low-visibility observations. Historical frequency, not a forecast.
Example facility
Critical gaps openProvisional readiness
SYNTHETIC EXAMPLE · INVENTED EVIDENCE
Baseline example. Power continuity is known absent or failed.
A high score cannot hide a critical gap.
The score and control status answer different questions. Review both before deciding what to fund, test or repair.
Three signals. No hidden gaps.
Status belongs to the individual control. It is never inferred from the headline number.
Demonstrated
Current evidence supports level 4 and its acceptance criterion.
Work remains
Current evidence supports levels 1–3. Full demonstration remains open.
Known gap
Reviewed evidence supports an absent or failed capability: level 0.
Unknown is a separate state. Missing, expired or contradictory evidence is unassessed. The headline score stays withheld until the evidence gates are met. “Clear” applies only to the stated control criterion; it does not certify a facility as safe.
Know what the number means.
Weights, evidence rules and release gates are published. The pilot is a working assessment method, not a validated loss model or operating authorization.
Read the methodology- GAO — Disaster Risk Improvements Needed to Enhance FEMA’s National Risk Index ↗10 September 2026. Recent findings on use guidance, sensitivity analysis, user feedback, and NRI migration to RAPT.
- NIST — Community Resilience Planning Guide A Playbook ↗Guide and current planning resources. Recovery targets tied to community functions and supporting infrastructure.
- Gerst Dillard and Loerzel via NIST — Methodological recommendations for content validation of community resilience indicators ↗2025. Research abstract supporting structured expert judgment alongside literature and empirical testing.
- FEMA — National Risk Index Technical Documentation v1.20 ↗December 2025. Technical sections on expected annual loss and percentile scores, reviewed through indexed extracts.
What would your facility score?
Start with a site, an essential service and the decision you need to make. We will define the scope and evidence required.