This record describes the specified arXiv version, not a journal publication. Weatherhill’s evidence note is a bounded source check and does not imply peer review. Subsequent versions may change the analysis.
What this source contributes.
The v4 model favors microcline (110) as an ice-nucleating template with initially cubic-rich clusters. A mechanistic prediction for targeted experimental comparison. Limit: Model melting point is not an experimental water phase boundary; cubic-rich nuclei do not redefine bulk equilibrium ice.
selected main text. v4 abstract, surface screening and seeding results, Fig. 3 text/caption, Conclusions and selected Methods; earlier versions not compared. Supplementary calculations and earlier version text not reviewed or compared. Review date: 2026-10-13. AI-assisted source check; not independent replication.
Read the connected Atlas case →
Primary material consulted
This is a bounded reading note. It is not independent replication, a full systematic review or an endorsement of every conclusion in the paper.
Questions to take to the paper
- Which particles remain below a droplet-classification cutoff?
- What happens when sample handling changes humidity?
- How does the seed population differ from the intended application?
A simulation, chamber result, field observation and operational outcome answer different questions. Record the comparator, measured quantity and conditions before carrying a result into a design.
Bibliographic provenance
Identifier, authors, title, posting date and version checked 2026-10-13 against the original arXiv repository record. The DOI field is intentionally empty. This preprint is kept distinct from any later journal version.