Keep essential
services ready.
Connect facility exposure, essential services and the evidence that shows whether a site is prepared. A practical starting point for municipal and multi-site portfolios.
Readiness · Measurement · EvidenceAI-GENERATED CONCEPT ART · NO DEPLOYMENT SHOWN
Which facilities have the most consequential unresolved readiness gaps—and who owns the next action?
Facilities directors, public-sector risk managers, emergency-management teams and operators responsible for multiple buildings.
A municipal portfolio can include fire stations, administrative buildings, libraries, depots and water facilities. Each faces different hazards, and each supports a different service. An address list is a useful start; it does not reveal whether backup power was tested, whether alternate access survives the same flood, or whether the person named in a response plan still owns that job.
The first deliverable is a usable, source-linked baseline: confirmed facilities, named essential functions, an exposure register, readiness evidence and an action list. Weatherhill Score makes the readiness findings understandable. Exposure Watch provides the commercial foundation for ongoing hazard monitoring; broader-sector onboarding and shared score synchronization must be confirmed in the customer scope.
Facility Portfolio Readiness Baseline
Begin with 10–25 facilities for an inventory and evidence screen, then select one to three priority sites for deeper review. This is not 25 full engineering assessments. Licensed design, code inspection, security assessments and equipment testing are separate specialist work packages.
What you receive
- A facility inventory with location uncertainty and ownership resolved
- A source-linked exposure profile, separate from readiness
- Readiness findings with evidence, review date and missing items
- Critical-gap register with action owners and proposed review dates
- A prioritized review workshop and an exportable baseline
How we know it is useful
The owner confirms every included facility and essential function. Every scored control has a criterion and traceable evidence or stays unknown. The final meeting resolves ownership of the next actions. We do not require a high score for the study to be accepted.
Planning duration: 2–4 weeks after complete records. Confirmed in the statement of work.
Review the scopeThe evidence behind the offer.
Facility Portfolio Exposure Monitoring
Build a facility register that connects official hazard observations with the operational questions each site needs to answer.
Read the guide ↗Critical Facility Backup Power Readiness
Review critical load, transfer behavior, fuel assumptions and common failures before treating backup power as demonstrated readiness.
Read the guide ↗Buying a Government Facility Readiness Study
Define the work package, delivery team and acceptance criteria before choosing a procurement route.
Read the guide ↗Exposure remains unchanged
Make readiness a maintained record.
Show the evidence behind the score, the critical gaps and the next action. Keep external hazard observations distinct from confirmed impacts. The functional score workbench supports local records and exports; connected account synchronization is a separate implementation step.
Explore the scoreSource-linked. Scope-specific.
- NIST — Community Resilience Planning Guide A Playbook ↗Guide and current planning resources. Recovery targets tied to community functions and supporting infrastructure.
- GSA Safeguarding Assets ↗Facility, equipment, communications and transport dependencies as mission risks.
- CISA Resilience Services ↗Existing voluntary security and resilience assessments and Infrastructure Survey Tool.
- CMS — Core Emergency Preparedness Rule Elements ↗Current guidance page. Four broad preparedness elements; specific provider obligations require current detailed guidance.
- Exposure Watch — Public product website ↗Reviewed 14 October 2026. Facility monitoring, source-cited observations, evidence history, and current health-care positioning. Public claims, not a backend audit.
Start with a decision.
Build the evidence around it.
Which facilities have the most consequential unresolved readiness gaps—and who owns the next action?