How it works / Water & drainage
CHAPTER 03 / WATER ACCOUNTING · PROPOSED APPLICATIONS

Follow every litre.

Trace liquid from the incoming fog to the collector, through drainage and treatment, and into useful storage. Then account for the energy.

The resource is a flow, not a photograph.

A foggy scene does not specify a water yield. The incoming liquid-water content, the air volume crossing the collection boundary and the duration determine the liquid available to intercept. Local wind, droplet sizes, seasonal occurrence and terrain all influence that resource.

Begin with a clearly drawn boundary. For a collector, that can be its inlet face and outlet drain. For a pond, it includes the receiver surface and all inflows and outflows. For an industrial process, it must include the equipment and operating changes that make recovery possible.

Q = U A
ṁin = LWC × Q
ṁdelivered = ηcapture ηdrain LWC × QQ: airflow (m³/s); U: face-normal speed (m/s); A: cross-section (m²); LWC: liquid-water content (kg/m³). Efficiencies are fractions between 0 and 1 and must be measured for the operating conditions. The calculator uses one combined delivery fraction.

Interception, drainage and usable water.

Water may arrive on the hardware yet remain as a film, evaporate, escape with the air or drain outside the intended receiver. Separating captured mass from delivered mass reveals whether the next improvement belongs in particle transport or in the surface and drainage system.

Useful water is a further step. Its composition can reflect the incoming air, collection materials and accumulated contamination. The intended use sets treatment and verification requirements. A collection rate does not establish drinking-water suitability or compatibility with a cooling loop.

Three Weatherhill applications.

  • FogFarm: establish a local fog resource, a passive collection baseline, storage delivery and the relationship to actual water demand. An annual total must account for periods without suitable fog.
  • PondFall: investigate whether an intervention increases delivery into a specified receiver. Direct deposition must be measured against natural deposition, evaporation and other flows; moving droplets near a pond is not proof that they enter it.
  • Industrial recovery: study a known mist or plume stream with its process owner. Identify what is liquid, what is vapor, what equipment changes heat rejection and where recovered water can be used.

Cooling towers: four different water pathways.

Evaporation removes heat by changing liquid water into vapor. Drift carries liquid droplets out with airflow. Blowdown removes concentrated circulating water to manage dissolved solids. Leaks and overflow are other losses. These routes have different remedies. DOE’s cooling-tower guidance provides the accounting framework. Source S11 →

Makeup = evaporation + blowdown + drift + other losses
Steady storage is assumed. A changing basin inventory must be included as a storage term. A droplet collector acts on entrained liquid; recovering vapor requires condensation or another suitable separation process.

Cooling performance must be measured alongside water savings. Added pressure drop can change fan demand or airflow. A treatment that impairs heat rejection is not adequately evaluated by its collected-water volume. Water chemistry, scaling, corrosion, biological control and maintenance constrain any proposed change.

The energy denominator matters.

Specific energy = total electricity / usable delivered water
Incremental specific energy = added electricity / positive added usable waterReport kWh per m³ of water, the baseline, the operating duration and every included load. Zero or negative incremental water gain cannot be assigned a finite favorable incremental efficiency.

A discharge-only energy figure excludes other equipment unless it is explicitly included. An honest comparison includes fans, pumps, power supplies, conditioning and relevant treatment. It also records maintenance and downtime instead of assuming continuous ideal operation.

A gain can coexist with a falling pond level.

If an intervention adds water but evaporation and withdrawals remain larger, the receiver still loses storage. The useful claim is the measured incremental benefit under matched conditions, with the overall balance reported alongside it.

WORK THROUGH A SCENARIO

MAKE THE
ASSUMPTIONS VISIBLE.

Change an input and inspect the result. This is an educational calculation with a declared boundary, not a forecast or hardware specification.

Keep the inputs, units and limitations with any result you use.

EXPLORE THE MODEL / HYPOTHETICAL INPUTS

What water crosses the boundary?

Inspect how a resource, a collection face and an assumed delivery fraction set the available flow.

Enable JavaScript to calculate. The equations are provided in the chapter.
Uses Q = U × A and a combined delivery fraction. 1 kg of water is approximated as 1 L. The delivery fraction is an assumption, not Weatherhill performance. Zero flow or delivery gives undefined water-normalized energy.
THE PROCESS IN MOTION

WATCH THE
EXPLANATION.

Original captioned schematic. Read the transcript for a text description of each stage.

From fog to useful water

32 SEC / CAPTIONED / SILENT SCHEMATIC

Track liquid across a collection boundary, including retained water, losses and delivery.

Read the complete transcript

00–08 seconds — 01 · RESOURCE
A fog collector intercepts existing liquid droplets. Harvesting water vapor requires a different phase-change process.

08–16 seconds — 02 · DESTINATIONS
Some intercepted water drains; some remains on surfaces or returns to the airflow. Measure each destination.

16–24 seconds — 03 · RECEIVER BALANCE
Receiver storage changes with deposition and rainfall minus evaporation, withdrawals and other losses.

24–32 seconds — 04 · USEFUL OUTPUT
Report delivered water, energy, maintenance and water quality together. Collected water is not automatically suitable for its intended use.

Download MP4 ↓ · Caption file ↓

TRACE THE EVIDENCE

Sources for this chapter.

  1. S1 / Damak & Varanasi · 2018Electrostatically driven fog collection using space charge injection ↗

    Primary collection experiments on wires and meshes. Supports the charged-droplet collection mechanism; does not establish Weatherhill performance or open-runway clearing.

  2. S2 / Li et al. · 2021Aerodynamics-assisted, efficient and scalable kirigami fog collectors ↗

    Primary experiments connecting collector geometry, aerodynamic deposition and drainage. Geometry-specific evidence.

  3. S11 / U.S. Department of Energy / FEMPBest Management Practice #10: Cooling Tower Management ↗

    Official water-management guidance. Separates evaporation, blowdown, drift and other losses; chemistry constrains operating choices.

TAKE THE NEXT STEP

A mechanism. A site.
A question worth measuring.

Tell us the operating problem and the evidence available. We can define the next study and the capabilities it needs.

Search weatherhill

Search papers, tools and the project.